Difference between revisions of "ac:hasServiceAccessPoint"
m (1 revision: skos: in scheme is handled by template: Concept scheme relation) |
|||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| hidden notes = // Repeatable = Yes | | hidden notes = // Repeatable = Yes | ||
}} | }} | ||
− | {{Concept relation| | + | {{Concept scheme relation |
− | {{Concept relation|relation = skos: collection|internal page = Audubon Core Management Vocabulary}} | + | |scheme=Audubon Core |
− | {{Concept relation|relation = skos: collection|internal page = Audubon Core Layer 1}} | + | }} |
+ | {{Concept relation | ||
+ | |relation=skos: collection | ||
+ | |internal page=Audubon Core Management Vocabulary | ||
+ | }} | ||
+ | {{Concept relation | ||
+ | |relation=skos: collection | ||
+ | |internal page=Audubon Core Layer 1 | ||
+ | }} |
Revision as of 17:43, 14 November 2012
Service Access Point No type definition was found for "hasServiceAccessPoint" in the ac import.
|
RDF feed | Browse properties | Concept type not set. A property page exists already. Please set “Concept type = property”. |
Search for values |
Notes: Audubon Core: Some serializations may flatten the model of service-access points by (a) dropping ac:hasServiceAccessPoint, ac:variant and ac:variantDescription, (b) repeating the properties of the Service Access Point Vocabulary and prefixing them with values of ac:variant. If such a flat serialization is necessary for services, we recommend to select from among terms of the form "AB" where "A" is one of thumbnail, trailer, lowerQuality, mediumQuality, goodQuality, bestQuality, offline and "B" is one of AccessURI, Format, Extent, FurtherInformationURL, LicensingException, ServiceExpectation (example: thumbnailAccessURI).
Implementers in specific constraint languages such as XML Schema or RDF may wish to make Access URI and perhaps dcterms:format mandatory on instances of the service access point.