Difference between revisions of "ac:metadataLanguage"

From TDWG Terms Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(fixed newline issue)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Concept
+
__NOINDEX__
| is defined by =
+
<span style="background-color:#ffc; padding:5px; color:#f00;border:1px solid #f00;">'''Warning''': This is not the current version of this document. It is kept for archival purposes. For up-to-date information, go to https://tdwg.github.io/ac/termlist/#ac_metadataLanguage</span><br /><br />
| label = Metadata Language
+
| definition =
+
| notes = <b>Audubon Core:</b> Language of description and other metadata (but not necessarily of the image itself) represented in ISO639-1 or -3.
+
  
This is NOT {{NS dcterms | language}}, which is about the resource, not the metadata. Metadata Language is deliberately single-valued, imposing for unstructured serializations a requirement that multi-lingual metadata be represented as separate, complete, metadata records. Audubon Core requires that each record also contains the language-neutral terms. In the absence of this requirement, metadata consumers would need to known which terms are language-neutral and merge these terms from all provided metadataLanguages into a single record. Metadata consumers may re-combine the information based on the dcterms:identifier that identifies the multimedia resource.
+
 
 +
{{Concept
 +
|label=Metadata Language
 +
|definition=Language of description and other metadata (but not necessarily of the image itself) represented in ISO639-1 or -3.
 +
|notes=This is NOT {{NS dcterms | language}}, which is about the resource, not the metadata. Metadata Language is deliberately single-valued, imposing for unstructured serializations a requirement that multi-lingual metadata be represented as separate, complete, metadata records. Audubon Core requires that each record also contains the language-neutral terms. In the absence of this requirement, metadata consumers would need to known which terms are language-neutral and merge these terms from all provided metadataLanguages into a single record. Metadata consumers may re-combine the information based on the dcterms:identifier that identifies the multimedia resource.
 
   
 
   
Nothing in this document would, however, prevent an implementer, e. g. of an XML-Schema representation, from providing a fully hierarchical schema in which language neutral terms occur only a single time, and only the language-specific terms are repeated in a way that unambigously relates them to a metadata language. In RDF it may be a simple repetition of plain literals associated with a language (e.g. xml:lang attribute in RDF/XML). The language attribute would then be required in Audubon Core and would replace ac:metadataLanguage.
+
Nothing in this document would, however, prevent an implementer, e. g. of an XML-Schema representation, from providing a fully hierarchical schema in which language neutral terms occur only a single time, and only the language-specific terms are repeated in a way that unambiguously relates them to a metadata language. In RDF it may be a simple repetition of plain literals associated with a language (e.g. xml:lang attribute in RDF/XML). The language attribute would then be required in Audubon Core and would replace ac:metadataLanguage.
  
 
Required.
 
Required.
| hidden notes = Crosswalk: NBII = Language of Cataloging; KeyToNature = {{NS k2n | Metadata_Language }}; Dublin Core = {{NS dcterms | language}} referring to a "metadata resource".; Morphbank = "English" // Repeatable = No
+
|is defined by={{ACTERMLIST}}#ac:metadataLanguage <!-- for ac at least, this pagename is also the term name -->
| concept type = property
+
|concept type=property
 +
|hidden notes=Crosswalk: NBII = Language of Cataloging; KeyToNature = {{NS k2n | Metadata_Language }}; Dublin Core = {{NS dcterms | language}} referring to a "metadata resource".; Morphbank = "English"
 +
}}
 +
{{Concept scheme relation
 +
|scheme=Audubon Core Development
 +
|property cardinality=1..1
 +
}}
 +
{{Concept relation
 +
|relation=skos: collection
 +
|internal page=Audubon Core Management Vocabulary
 +
}}
 +
{{Concept relation
 +
|relation=skos: collection
 +
|internal page=Audubon Core Layer 1
 
}}
 
}}
{{Concept relation|relation = skos: in scheme |internal page = Audubon Core}}
 
{{Concept relation|relation = skos: collection|internal page = Audubon Core Management Vocabulary}}
 
{{Concept relation|relation = skos: collection|internal page = Audubon Core Layer 1}}
 
 
 
<noinclude>'''References'''<br/><references/></noinclude>
 
<noinclude>'''References'''<br/><references/></noinclude>

Latest revision as of 13:04, 5 March 2020

Warning: This is not the current version of this document. It is kept for archival purposes. For up-to-date information, go to https://tdwg.github.io/ac/termlist/#ac_metadataLanguage

Scheme: Audubon Core Development Pencil.png
Collections: Audubon Core Management Vocabulary Pencil.png, Audubon Core Layer 1 Pencil.png
Metadata Language
Search for values Crystal Clear action find.png
Metadata Language: Language of description and other metadata (but not necessarily of the image itself) represented in ISO639-1 or -3.

Notes: This is NOT dcterms:language [1], which is about the resource, not the metadata. Metadata Language is deliberately single-valued, imposing for unstructured serializations a requirement that multi-lingual metadata be represented as separate, complete, metadata records. Audubon Core requires that each record also contains the language-neutral terms. In the absence of this requirement, metadata consumers would need to known which terms are language-neutral and merge these terms from all provided metadataLanguages into a single record. Metadata consumers may re-combine the information based on the dcterms:identifier that identifies the multimedia resource.

Nothing in this document would, however, prevent an implementer, e. g. of an XML-Schema representation, from providing a fully hierarchical schema in which language neutral terms occur only a single time, and only the language-specific terms are repeated in a way that unambiguously relates them to a metadata language. In RDF it may be a simple repetition of plain literals associated with a language (e.g. xml:lang attribute in RDF/XML). The language attribute would then be required in Audubon Core and would replace ac:metadataLanguage.

Required.
The given value was not understood.
The given value was not understood.

Constraints in the context of Audubon Core Development:

References
  1. dcterms = http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/