Difference between revisions of "ac:reviewerComments"
From TDWG Terms Wiki
(Refactoring existing definitions fromAudubon_Core_Term_List_(1.0_normative) to individual pages (automatic import through xml file)) |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| label = Reviewer Comments | | label = Reviewer Comments | ||
| definition = Any comment provided by a reviewer with expertise in the subject, as free-form text. | | definition = Any comment provided by a reviewer with expertise in the subject, as free-form text. | ||
− | | notes = <b>Audubon Core:</b> Reviewer Comments may refer to the resource itself (e. g., asserting a taxon name or location of a biological subject in an image), or to the relation between resource and associated metadata (e. g., asserting that the taxon name given in metadata is wrong, without asserting a positive identification). There is a separate item “Comments” for text from commenters of unrecorded expertise. | + | | notes = <b>Audubon Core:</b> Reviewer Comments may refer to the resource itself (e. g., asserting a taxon name or location of a biological subject in an image), or to the relation between resource and associated metadata (e. g., asserting that the taxon name given in the metadata is wrong, without asserting a positive identification). There is a separate item “Comments” for text from commenters of unrecorded expertise. |
| hidden notes = Crosswalk:NBII = PeerReviewerComments; KeyToNature = {{NS k2n | Reviewer_Comments }} // Repeatable = Yes | | hidden notes = Crosswalk:NBII = PeerReviewerComments; KeyToNature = {{NS k2n | Reviewer_Comments }} // Repeatable = Yes | ||
| concept type = property | | concept type = property |
Revision as of 07:34, 15 October 2012
Reviewer Comments
|
Search for values |
Notes: Audubon Core: Reviewer Comments may refer to the resource itself (e. g., asserting a taxon name or location of a biological subject in an image), or to the relation between resource and associated metadata (e. g., asserting that the taxon name given in the metadata is wrong, without asserting a positive identification). There is a separate item “Comments” for text from commenters of unrecorded expertise.