Difference between revisions of "ac:reviewerComments"
From TDWG Terms Wiki
m (Created page with "{{Concept |label=Reviewer Comments |is defined by=ac:reviewerComments |concept type=property |definition=Any comment provided by a reviewer with expertise in the subject, as f...") |
(fixed newline issue) |
||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | __NOINDEX__ | ||
| + | <span style="background-color:#ffc; padding:5px; color:#f00;border:1px solid #f00;">'''Warning''': This is not the current version of this document. It is kept for archival purposes. For up-to-date information, go to https://tdwg.github.io/ac/termlist/#ac_reviewerComments</span><br /><br /> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
{{Concept | {{Concept | ||
| − | + | | is defined by = | |
| − | |is defined by= | + | | label = Reviewer Comments |
| − | | | + | | definition = Any comment provided by a reviewer with expertise in the subject, as free-form text. |
| − | |definition=Any comment provided by a reviewer with expertise in the subject, as free-form text. | + | | notes = '''Audubon Core:''' Reviewer Comments may refer to the resource itself (e. g., asserting a taxon name or location of a biological subject in an image), or to the relation between resource and associated metadata (e. g., asserting that the taxon name given in the metadata is wrong, without asserting a positive identification). There is a separate item “Comments” for text from commenters of unrecorded expertise. |
| − | |notes=Reviewer Comments may refer to the resource itself (e. g., asserting a taxon name or location of a biological subject in an image), or to the relation between resource and associated metadata (e. g., asserting that the taxon name given in metadata is wrong, without asserting a positive identification). There is a separate item “Comments” for text from commenters of unrecorded expertise. | + | | hidden notes = Crosswalk:NBII = PeerReviewerComments; KeyToNature = {{NS k2n | Reviewer_Comments }} // Repeatable = Yes |
| − | |hidden notes=Crosswalk:NBII = PeerReviewerComments; KeyToNature = {{NS k2n | Reviewer_Comments }} | + | | concept type = property |
| + | }} | ||
| + | {{Concept scheme relation | ||
| + | |scheme=Audubon Core Development | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Concept relation | {{Concept relation | ||
| − | |relation=skos: | + | |relation=skos: collection |
| − | |internal page=Audubon Core | + | |internal page=Audubon Core Management Vocabulary |
}} | }} | ||
{{Concept relation | {{Concept relation | ||
|relation=skos: collection | |relation=skos: collection | ||
| − | |internal page= | + | |internal page=Audubon Core Layer 2 |
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 13:05, 5 March 2020
Warning: This is not the current version of this document. It is kept for archival purposes. For up-to-date information, go to https://tdwg.github.io/ac/termlist/#ac_reviewerComments
| Reviewer Comments |
Search for values  |
Notes: Audubon Core: Reviewer Comments may refer to the resource itself (e. g., asserting a taxon name or location of a biological subject in an image), or to the relation between resource and associated metadata (e. g., asserting that the taxon name given in the metadata is wrong, without asserting a positive identification). There is a separate item “Comments” for text from commenters of unrecorded expertise.
