Talk:Audubon Core (Scheme)

MEMO: When preparing the atomized version (each term on one page), the following collection names have been used in the first version:

• relation=skos: in scheme |internal page=Audubon Core
• relation=skos: collection|internal page=Audubon Core Layer 1
• relation=skos: collection|internal page=Audubon Core Layer 2
• relation=skos: collection|internal page=Audubon Core Management Vocabulary
• relation=skos: collection|internal page=Audubon Core Attribution Vocabulary
• relation=skos: collection|internal page=Audubon Core Agents Vocabulary
• relation=skos: collection|internal page=Audubon Core Content Coverage Vocabulary
• relation=skos: collection|internal page=Audubon Core Geography Vocabulary
• relation=skos: collection|internal page=Audubon Core Temporal Coverage Vocabulary
• relation=skos: collection|internal page=Audubon Core Subject of Resource Vocabulary
• relation=skos: collection|internal page=Audubon Core Taxonomic Coverage Vocabulary
• relation=skos: collection|internal page=Audubon Core Resource Creation Vocabulary
• relation=skos: collection|internal page=Audubon Core Related Resources Vocabulary
• relation=skos: collection|internal page=Audubon Core Record-level Service Access Point Vocabulary
• relation=skos: collection|internal page=Audubon Core Access-level Service Access Point Vocabulary

First version: Details mapped to "see Also". BUT perhaps better: vann:usageNote. If present, RDF will use this, if not it will use the wiki page. CHECK: is page itself as well as discussion referenced as in Google docs planned? Gregor Hagedorn 20:50, 6 October 2012 (CEST)