Difference between revisions of "ft:antipetalous"

From TDWG Terms Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Talk)
 
(Talk)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Concept
 
{{Concept
 
|label=antipetalous
 
|label=antipetalous
 +
|example=Example sentences from FNA : [1] stamens 2--3 fertile and antisepalous, 3--4 staminodial and antipetalous (if 4, then 1 antisepalous );  [2] stamens 10, in 2 whorls of 5, outer whorl antipetalous, free, distinct or barely adnate to petals;
 +
|definition=Each inserted directly above or below a petal. In place of this term, the phrase "opposite the petals" is often used, but that contradicts the sense of opposite as otherwise employed (arrangement of lateral structures along an axis) and should be avoided.<ref name='hunt'>Categorical Glossary for the Flora of North America Project, by Robert W. Kiger and Duncan M. Porter. 2001. Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation.</ref>
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Concept scheme relation
 
{{Concept scheme relation
Line 9: Line 11:
 
|internal page=ft:position
 
|internal page=ft:position
 
}}
 
}}
 +
==References==
 +
<references />

Latest revision as of 19:25, 8 December 2014

Scheme: FloraTerms Pencil.png
Collection: ft:position Pencil.png
antipetalous
The import namespace "ft" is unknown. Please ensure that OWL import details are available via MediaWiki:Smw import ft
Search for values Crystal Clear action find.png
antipetalous: Each inserted directly above or below a petal. In place of this term, the phrase "opposite the petals" is often used, but that contradicts the sense of opposite as otherwise employed (arrangement of lateral structures along an axis) and should be avoided.[1]
The given value was not understood.
The given value was not understood.

Example(s): Example sentences from FNA : [1] stamens 2--3 fertile and antisepalous, 3--4 staminodial and antipetalous (if 4, then 1 antisepalous ); [2] stamens 10, in 2 whorls of 5, outer whorl antipetalous, free, distinct or barely adnate to petals;

References

  1. Categorical Glossary for the Flora of North America Project, by Robert W. Kiger and Duncan M. Porter. 2001. Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation.