Difference between revisions of "abcd2:Unit-Owner-Organisation-Text"

From TDWG Terms Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(top: mass importing all ABCD 2.06 concepts)
 
(added ABCD2 Hierarchy segment)
 
Line 50: Line 50:
 
|type=String255
 
|type=String255
 
}}
 
}}
 +
 +
== ABCD2 Hierarchy ==
 +
{{XPathSegments|abcd2:|/DataSets|/DataSet|/Units|/Unit|/Owner|/Organisation|/Name|/Representation|/Text}}

Latest revision as of 11:29, 24 January 2017

Scheme: ABCD 2 Pencil.png
Collection: ABCD Unit Pencil.png
Unit-Owner-Organisation-Text
No type definition was found for "Unit-Owner-Organisation-Text" in the abcd2 import.
Search for values Crystal Clear action find.png
Unit-Owner-Organisation-Text (also /DataSets/DataSet/Units/Unit/Owner/Organisation/Name/Representation/Text): Label text in a specific language representing the organisation of the legal owner of the unit record.

Notes: So far, for these pages I have been using the term "unit". Should it be "unit record" or something else?

$$Yael$$ Here, we should speak of Unit record; the same is true for the IPR Statements (next item in the schema diagram). I thought I got these things more or less right in the explanations on the unit-level, but found some exeptions (will change in the schema, too):

The following should be "unit record" instead of Unit:
Unit Content Contacts, .. subtypes of the unit (2 cases), Associations, Assemblages

The following should be "unit" instead of Sampling Unit (a term not to be used):
Gathering

The following are correctly termed Unit:
Source Reference, Unit References, Identifications, Kind Of Unit, Multi Media Object, Named Collection Or Surveys, Measurements Or Facts, Sex, Age, Sequences.

Constraints in the context of ABCD 2:



ABCD2 Hierarchy

XPath Segments: /DataSets /DataSet /Units /Unit /Owner /Organisation /Name /Representation /Text