Difference between revisions of "ft:eroded"

From TDWG Terms Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Talk)
(Talk)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Concept
 
{{Concept
 
|label=eroded
 
|label=eroded
 +
|example=Example sentences from FOC V22 : [1] outer petals with marginal wing strongly developed, distinctly revolute, not eroded, apex rounded, distinctly notched.  [2] margin entire or finely eroded-denticulate toward apex with margin often hyaline, apex rounded or rarely subapiculate.
 +
|definition=Having rough, very irregular depressions throughout.<ref name='hunt'>Categorical Glossary for the Flora of North America Project, by Robert W. Kiger and Duncan M. Porter. 2001. Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation.</ref>
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Concept scheme relation
 
{{Concept scheme relation
Line 9: Line 11:
 
|internal page=ft:architecture
 
|internal page=ft:architecture
 
}}
 
}}
 +
{{Concept relation
 +
|relation=skos: collection
 +
|internal page=ft:relief
 +
}}
 +
==References==
 +
<references />

Latest revision as of 20:16, 8 December 2014

Scheme: FloraTerms Pencil.png
Collections: ft:architecture Pencil.png, ft:relief Pencil.png
eroded
The import namespace "ft" is unknown. Please ensure that OWL import details are available via MediaWiki:Smw import ft
Search for values Crystal Clear action find.png
eroded: Having rough, very irregular depressions throughout.[1]
The given value was not understood.
The given value was not understood.

Example(s): Example sentences from FOC V22 : [1] outer petals with marginal wing strongly developed, distinctly revolute, not eroded, apex rounded, distinctly notched. [2] margin entire or finely eroded-denticulate toward apex with margin often hyaline, apex rounded or rarely subapiculate.

References

  1. Categorical Glossary for the Flora of North America Project, by Robert W. Kiger and Duncan M. Porter. 2001. Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation.