Difference between revisions of "ft:cleft"

Revision as of 23:43, 1 December 2014 (view source) (Talk)		Latest revision as of 19:49, 8 December 2014 (view source) (Talk)
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Concept		{{Concept
	|label=cleft		|label=cleft
		+	|example=Example sentences from FOC V12 : [1] stipules deciduous, intrapetiolar, incompletely connate, apex 2-cleft;  [2] Perianth 5-cleft to 1/2, herbaceous, minutely papillate, margin white;
		+	|definition=Having two or more component sectors or peripheral protrusions that are delimited by concavities in the margin or surface and that are not proximally distinct from the remainder of the whole. The meanings of this term and its approximate synonyms sometimes have been supposed to differ according to the depth of the delimiting concavities relative to the midline or midpoint of the overall structure, and/or to the shape or proportions of the protusions or sectors, however, there has been little consistency in the applications of the various terms according to such distinctions, which are ones only of degree and are necessarily arbitrary in any case. In general usage, these terms differ only indistinctly and connotatively: cleft, lobed (or lobate), parted (or partite) and segmented tend to connote fewer protrusions or sectors, lobate usually connotes as well a generally rounded shape, dissected tends to connote more numerous sectors that are elongate and angular. See also cut (incised, lacerate, torn), laciniate (slashed).<ref name='hunt'>Categorical Glossary for the Flora of North America Project, by Robert W. Kiger and Duncan M. Porter. 2001. Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation.</ref>
	}}		}}
	{{Concept scheme relation		{{Concept scheme relation
	|scheme=FloraTerms		|scheme=FloraTerms
		+	}}
		+	{{Concept relation
		+	|relation=skos: collection
		+	|internal page=ft:architecture
	}}		}}
	{{Concept relation		{{Concept relation
Line 9:		Line 15:
	|internal page=ft:shape		|internal page=ft:shape
	}}		}}
		+	==References==
		+	<references />

---

Latest revision as of 19:49, 8 December 2014

Scheme: FloraTerms 
Collections: ft:architecture , ft:shape 

cleft The import namespace "ft" is unknown. Please ensure that OWL import details are available via MediaWiki:Smw import ft URI: http://rs.tdwg.org/ft/terms/cleft

RDF feed | Browse properties |  Concept type not set.

Search for values

cleft: Having two or more component sectors or peripheral protrusions that are delimited by concavities in the margin or surface and that are not proximally distinct from the remainder of the whole. The meanings of this term and its approximate synonyms sometimes have been supposed to differ according to the depth of the delimiting concavities relative to the midline or midpoint of the overall structure, and/or to the shape or proportions of the protusions or sectors, however, there has been little consistency in the applications of the various terms according to such distinctions, which are ones only of degree and are necessarily arbitrary in any case. In general usage, these terms differ only indistinctly and connotatively: cleft, lobed (or lobate), parted (or partite) and segmented tend to connote fewer protrusions or sectors, lobate usually connotes as well a generally rounded shape, dissected tends to connote more numerous sectors that are elongate and angular. See also cut (incised, lacerate, torn), laciniate (slashed).^[1]

The given value was not understood.

The given value was not understood.

Example(s): Example sentences from FOC V12 : [1] stipules deciduous, intrapetiolar, incompletely connate, apex 2-cleft; [2] Perianth 5-cleft to 1/2, herbaceous, minutely papillate, margin white;

References

1. ↑ Categorical Glossary for the Flora of North America Project, by Robert W. Kiger and Duncan M. Porter. 2001. Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation.