View source for User:BobMorris

AC data model has no RDF representation.  By contrast, DwC has its underlying defn in RDF, albeit one defined for documentation more than KR.  By contrast, the documentation for AC is generated by data for MediaWiki templates defined on terms.tdwg.org wiki.

This RDF is actually a \documentation/ (in html) of an RDF representation of RDF generated from the MW template data.  In particular, no representation of the adopted-by-inclusion DwC terms, notably the geography terms

For utility need to add a  KR-useful(e.g. OWL ontology) RDF representation of (those parts of DwC).  At least 3 known, each in use only(?) in the projects that defined them

<!-- See also http://species-id.net/wiki/Template:MRTG_TermNoComments2 for main term expansions -->
{{#vardefine:renderAs|RDF}}<div style='font-family:"Courier New", "Lucida Console"'>
<nowiki># Non-normative, minimalistic, representation of http://terms.gbif.org/wiki/Audubon_Core_Term_List</nowiki> in N3 representation of RDF.  This actually an HTML page and must be cut-and-pasted and saved with a text editor.<br/>
{{:AC_RDF_N3_Prefixes_and_Class_Declarations}}{{:Audubon_Core_Term_List}}